News:

SMF - Just Installed!

Main Menu

The lion in the middle ages

Started by Imperial Dave, May 11, 2025, 06:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Imperial Dave

Former Slingshot editor

DBS

And then there is of course the theory that some of the early proto heraldic lions were actually leopards. Cue outraged English footie fans...
David Stevens

Jim Webster

Interestingly the wiki comments "The lions passant guardant were historically referred to as leopards, but this refers to their pose rather than species"
They give as a source https://web.archive.org/web/20210603110243/https://www.heraldsnet.org/saitou/parker/Jpglossl.htm#Lion

Lion, (fr. lion): this beast is perhaps the most frequent of all bearings. In early heraldry it is generally represented rampant, while leopards are represented passant guardant, and hence the arms of England, not doubt, are more correctly blazoned, Leopards. Practically, however, the same animal was intended, but different names given according to the position; in later times the name lion was given to both. The chief evidence is that the first entry in one of out earliest rolls of arms runs:--
    Le Roy d'Angleterre porte goules, trois lupards d'or--Roll, temp. HEN. III.
    Son fitz teile, ovecque ung labell d'azur--Ibid.
    And in the early roll of Edward II. the royal arms thus blazoned:--
    Le Roy de Engletere porte de goules, iij lupars passauns de or.


Imperial Dave

I'm still looking for the witch and the wardrobe...
Former Slingshot editor

Jim Webster

Quote from: Imperial Dave on May 11, 2025, 05:06 PMI'm still looking for the witch and the wardrobe...
She's in the wardrobe hiding from the big cats  :o

Imperial Dave

Former Slingshot editor

DBS

Quote from: Jim Webster on May 11, 2025, 04:08 PMPractically, however, the same animal was intended
Perhaps more accurately, the average Norman had no real clue as to difference between a leopard, a species he had never seen, and a lion, a species he had never seen...  ;)
David Stevens

Keraunos

Quote from: DBS on May 11, 2025, 07:31 PM
Quote from: Jim Webster on May 11, 2025, 04:08 PMPractically, however, the same animal was intended
Perhaps more accurately, the average Norman had no real clue as to difference between a leopard, a species he had never seen, and a lion, a species he had never seen...  ;)

I'd bet that the average Norman was not into heraldry, but with the way the men of the North had been getting around there is a fair chance that some of them might have seen lions or leopards in the flesh.  And trade in exotic animals was still a thing, though on less of a scale than under dear old Rome.  Charlemagne had an elephant  ;)

Imperial Dave

Former Slingshot editor

DBS

#9
Quote from: Imperial Dave on May 12, 2025, 05:22 AMIt's dragons you need....
Ah, but a lion-dragon or a snake-dragon?

Or a lion-snake-bird-dragon?
David Stevens

Imperial Dave

Former Slingshot editor