Did Beaker people wipe out 93% of Cumbrians 5000 years ago?

Started by Imperial Dave, Feb 18, 2026, 09:23 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Erpingham

Advancing such a huge idea based on a sample of 37 bodies seems a little risky. No matter how "advanced" your mathematical techniques are.

Imperial Dave

Former Slingshot editor

Jon Freitag

Not sure that "my math is better than yours" is such a convincing argument!  Looking at the DNA models and the 90% replacement theory, themselves, might be an interesting exercise.  Surprised that Prof. Thomas did not invoke British statistician Cox's comment when he stated that "all models are wrong, but some are useful" as a counterpoint.  Who funded the American study?