SoA Forum

History => Ancient and Medieval History => Topic started by: Imperial Dave on Jul 04, 2017, 06:27 AM

Title: Guardian article on Roman concrete
Post by: Imperial Dave on Jul 04, 2017, 06:27 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jul/04/why-roman-concrete-still-stands-strong-while-modern-version-decays?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

not 'new news' as such but a worthy little article on the legacy of our Roman friends :)
Title: Re: Guardian article on Roman concrete
Post by: Duncan Head on Jul 04, 2017, 08:01 AM
And it's all because it contains wombles (well, "tobermorite", anyway).
Title: Re: Guardian article on Roman concrete
Post by: Tim on Jul 04, 2017, 10:02 PM
Worryingly I am old enough to appreciate the play on words...
Title: Re: Guardian article on Roman concrete
Post by: Swampster on Jul 05, 2017, 07:04 AM
Tomskite would be stronger. Orinocoene would collapse after a bit of hard work.
Title: Re: Guardian article on Roman concrete
Post by: Imperial Dave on Jul 05, 2017, 10:14 AM
Quote from: Tim on Jul 04, 2017, 10:02 PM
Worryingly I am old enough to appreciate the play on words...

me too  :-[