Quote from: nikgaukroger on Jun 09, 2026, 02:57 PMQuote from: madaxeman on Jun 09, 2026, 09:15 AMIn Game 3 the Justinians take a trip through time to engage in another Civil War against their near-ancestors, the Thematic Byzantines, who, like the Zapotecs, appear less interested in fighting the battle and more eager to debate the origins of the appellation "Thematic" as the action continues around them.
Descendants rather than ancestors, surely?
Quote from: nikgaukroger on Jun 09, 2026, 02:57 PMQuote from: madaxeman on Jun 09, 2026, 09:15 AMIn Game 3 the Justinians take a trip through time to engage in another Civil War against their near-ancestors, the Thematic Byzantines, who, like the Zapotecs, appear less interested in fighting the battle and more eager to debate the origins of the appellation "Thematic" as the action continues around them.
Descendants rather than ancestors, surely?
Quote from: madaxeman on Jun 09, 2026, 09:15 AMIn Game 3 the Justinians take a trip through time to engage in another Civil War against their near-ancestors, the Thematic Byzantines, who, like the Zapotecs, appear less interested in fighting the battle and more eager to debate the origins of the appellation "Thematic" as the action continues around them.
Quote from: simonw on Jun 08, 2026, 06:31 PMFellow Society members,
Just to add that the Sea Peoples v New Kingdom Egyptians Tactica 2 game at Carronade received nothing but eminently favourable responses on the day from attendees and the organisers as well as in other online forums after the fact.
Personally, I think that he game displayed (and played) fulfilled one of the main aims of wargames shows; namely to promote enthusiasm for and the profile of the hobby. These are also some of the aims of the SoA, aren't they?
Accordingly, I find it somewhat disappointing that a reporting of the event to a Society aiming to promote the hobby of Ancients Wargaming as well as Research into and study of the Ancient Warfare seems to have generated so little favourable appreciation of what was a highly complimented, historical wargame display (and Public Participation) game.
Now, not being directly involved myself, other than lending a few figures, I do not seek personal favour as I act merely as a 'reporter' of the event prepared and presented by others (and indeed using photos provided to me by others). I do find the response from the membership of a group (the SoA) with putatively similar interests and aims somewhat underwhelming.
What does this say about the SoA membership in general?
I don't know.
Opinions welcome.
Thanks
Simon