SoA Forum

History => Ancient and Medieval History => Topic started by: Duncan Head on Aug 30, 2026, 10:56 AM

Title: Who was "Conquest Man"?
Post by: Duncan Head on Aug 30, 2026, 10:56 AM
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/aug/30/11th-century-conquest-man-scandinavian-norman-army
Title: Re: Who was "Conquest Man"?
Post by: Keraunos on Aug 30, 2026, 12:28 PM
The level of detail that goes into these facial reconstructions is stunning but I can't help wondering how much foundation there is for it.
Title: Re: Who was "Conquest Man"?
Post by: Jim Webster on Aug 30, 2026, 12:33 PM
Given the nature of the North, Dane Law, trade etc, there were more ways for people of Scandinavian extraction to get into England than over Pevensey Beach
But with the tapestry etc there will be the temptation to link absolutely everything to the arrival of William the Bastard
Title: Re: Who was "Conquest Man"?
Post by: Sharur on Aug 30, 2026, 07:12 PM
Quote from: Keraunos on Aug 30, 2026, 12:28 PMThe level of detail that goes into these facial reconstructions is stunning but I can't help wondering how much foundation there is for it.

Wikipedia has a fairly decent summary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_facial_reconstruction) of the various techniques and their problems, though it's not as up-to-date as it might be. It's a fascinating, and difficult, subject that crosses over the art-science boundary, often to the discomfort of those further on the "science" side.
Title: Re: Who was "Conquest Man"?
Post by: Keraunos on Aug 30, 2026, 11:42 PM
Quote from: Sharur on Aug 30, 2026, 07:12 PM
Quote from: Keraunos on Aug 30, 2026, 12:28 PMThe level of detail that goes into these facial reconstructions is stunning but I can't help wondering how much foundation there is for it.

Wikipedia has a fairly decent summary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_facial_reconstruction) of the various techniques and their problems, though it's not as up-to-date as it might be. It's a fascinating, and difficult, subject that crosses over the art-science boundary, often to the discomfort of those further on the "science" side.

Thank you.  Most interesting.